Breadcrumbs

neal young / evaluations

Here are summaries of student course evaluations of courses I taught at UCR.

Ratings are on a scale of five. Percentiles are with respect to all UCR courses.

term course enrollment number of respondents Instructor was effective as a teacher overall? The course overall as a learning experience was excellent? full details
mean median %tile mean median %tile
fall 2011
engr101
71
60
4.4
4.5
77
4.3
4.5
74
more
fall 2011
cs218
47
40
4.5
5
81
4.4
5
78
more
spring 2011
cs141
30
28
4.5
5
83
4.4
5
79
more
fall 2010
engr101
45
43
4.7
5
90
4.5
4.5
83
more
fall 2010
cs218
41
26
4.8
5
93
4.7
5
90
more
spring 2010
cs141
44
35
4.5
5
78
4.4
5
76
more
winter 2010
cs262
8
8
4.9
5
96
4.6
5
85
more
fall 2009
cs218
57
47
4.6
5
87
4.3
5
78
more
spring 2008
cs260
7
6
4.8
5
92
4.8
5
92
more
winter 2008
cs215
14
13
5
5
100
4.8
5
93
more
fall 2007
cs141
27
14
4.5
5
79
4.2
4
70
more
spring 2007
cs260
10
9
4.1
5
64
4.1
5
67
more
spring 2007
cs145
16
12
4.5
5
80
4.1
4.5
67
more
fall 2006
cs141
22
21
4.7
5
88
4.2
4
71
more

 

hide/show: means | medians | %tiles

The evaluation format changed in spring 2006. Here are summaries for courses taught prior to that.

Ratings are on a scale of seven.

term course enrollment number of forms returned What is your overall rating of the instructor? What is your overall rating of the course? full details
mean median %tile mean median %tile
spring 2006
cs141
27
24
6.3
7
79
5.8
6
65
 more
winter 2006
cs260
8
8
6.9
7
98
6.8
7
95
 more
winter 2006
cs141
28
24
6.4
7
85
5.5
5
61
 more
fall 2005
cs141
20
15
6.3
6
81
5.8
6
67
 more
winter 2005
cs141
22
14
6.3
6.5
83
5.5
5
62
 more
fall 2004
cs215
23
19
6.68
7
6.11
7
more
spring 2004
cs141 (1)
33
19
6.26
6
4.94
5
spring 2004
cs141 (2)
50
31
6.35
7
5.7
6
winter 2004
cs260
11
10
6.8
7
6.3
6

Now isn't that better than ratemyprofessors.com?