| 
CS204: ProjectSpring Quarter 2016 The goal of the project is to connect a paper you've read with real implementation.
The project is deliberately under-specified so that you can have a taste of working on an open-ended research problem. Choose a paper from amongst those we've read, or (I encourage this), explore something new. Note down some of the questions you have while reading the paper, and think about how you could design experiments to answer those questions. For example: 
Does a questionable result in a paper you read hold up when you replicate it? What happens if you vary a parameter the original experimenter didn't consider?If you mix two pieces of work, what new effects occur?
You may try to reproduce existing results (good), negate existing results (better), or produce new results (even better). These results can be either analytic, or experimental. If experimental, you may need to learn new tools to complete the project, based on your chosen topic. Mininet might be a good starting point. You may have to 4 members of your group. RequirementsProject proposal and update discussions (10%) Project presentations (10%) Final report (20%) 
Up to 6 pages, 11pt, double-columnConsider the following questions 
What paper did you choose, and why is this work important?What subset of results in the original paper did you try to reproduce/improve upon? Why that particular subset?What did your results look like? Deadlines
May 5-6: project proposal discussion with professorMay 19-20: project update with professorMay 27, June 1, June 3: project presentationsJune 10: final report due Places to Look for Papers
SIGCOMM: ACM Annual SIGCOMM ConferenceNSDI: USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and ImplementationCoNEXT: ACM International Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and TechnologiesInfocom: IEEE International Conference on Computer CommunicationsCCR: Computer Communications Review.IMC: International Measurement Conference Project SuggestionsNote that these are suggestions only, you can pick one of these but are expected to elaborate on it, or pick a different question about the paper, or pick a different paper. GPS + Leaky bucket [pdf] MPTCP [pdf] 
Paper: design of MPTCP congestion control and schedulingWhat's the interaction between congestion control and scheduling?Open-source MPTCP kernel implementation available http:multipath-tcp.org/ AVIS [pdf] 
Paper: optimize video rates to maximize utility and link utilizationHow to modify if to account for varying user arrivals, to ensure we eventually converge to the optimal solution? VL2 [pdf] Bufferbloat [pdf] 
Paper: Due to large buffers, some flows experience excessively long delaysCan you emulate these results in Mininet? MPEG-DASH [pdf] Internet topology weaknesses [pdf] 
Paper: Knocking out a few “core” routers will destroy the Internet Can you show this collapse using a large-scale simulation? Note that there have been several follow-up works refuting the original argument, so it may be good to also pick one of them and see which argument holds, backed up by quantitative data from the simulation. Final presentation schedule5/27
Video streaming over LTE + WiFi (Payas)CDN latency (Niloufar, Andres, Christina)Powerlne communications (Patrick) 6/1
TCP replay (Ahmad, Abhinav)Chord (Lyuye, Nan, Kaicheng, Dennis)MPTCP (Ignacio, Maria) 6/3 |