Ten Simple Rules
Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published
by Philip E. Bourne, PLoS Computational Biology
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010057
- Read many papers, and learn from both the good and the bad work of others.
- The more objective you can be about your work, the better that work will ultimately become.
- Good editors and reviewers will be objective about your work.
- If you do not write well in the English language, take lessons early; it will be invaluable later.
- Learn to live with rejection.
- The ingredients of good science are obvious—novelty of research topic, comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature, good data, good analysis including strong statistical support, and a thought-provoking discussion. The ingredients of good science reporting are obvious—good organization, the appropriate use of tables and figures, the right length, writing to the intended audience—do not ignore the obvious.
- Start writing the paper the day you have the idea of what questions to pursue.
- Become a reviewer early in your career.
- Decide early on where to try to publish your paper.
- Quality is everything.
Ten Simple Rules for Getting Grants
by Philip E. Bourne and Leo M. Chalupa, PLoS Computational Biology
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020012
- Be Novel, but Not Too Novel
- Include the Appropriate Background and Preliminary Data as Required
- Find the Appropriate Funding Mechanism, Read the Associated Request for Applications Very Carefully, and Respond Specifically to the Request
- Follow the Guidelines for Submission Very Carefully and Comply
- Obey the Three Cs—Concise, Clear, and Complete
- Remember, Reviewers Are People, Too
- Timing and Internal Review Are Important
- Know Your Grant Administrator at the Institution Funding Your Grant
- Become a Grant Reviewer Early in Your Career
- Accept Rejection and Deal with It Appropriately
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers
by Philip E. Bourne and Alon Korngreen, PLoS Computational Biology
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020110
- Do Not Accept a Review Assignment unless You Can Accomplish the Task in the Requested Timeframe—Learn to Say No
- Avoid Conflict of Interest
- Write Reviews You Would Be Satisfied with as an Author
- As a Reviewer You Are Part of the Authoring Process
- Be Sure to Enjoy and to Learn from the Reviewing Process
- Develop a Method of Reviewing That Works for You
- Spend Your Precious Time on Papers Worthy of a Good Review
- Maintain the Anonymity of the Review Process if the Journal Requires It
- Write Clearly, Succinctly, and in a Neutral Tone, but Be Decisive
- Make Use of the "Comments to Editors"
Ten Simple Rules for Selecting a Postdoctoral Position
by Philip E. Bourne and Iddo Friedberg, PLoS Computational Biology
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020121
- Select a Position that Excites You
- Select a Laboratory That Suits Your Work and Lifestyle
- Select a Laboratory and a Project That Develop New Skills
- Have a Backup Plan
- Choose a Project with Tangible Outcomes That Match Your Career Goals
- Negotiate First Authorship before You Start
- The Time in a Postdoctoral Fellowship Should Be Finite
- Evaluate the Growth Path
- Strive to Get Your Own Money
- Learn to Recognize Opportunities
Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration
by Quentin Vicens and Philip E. Bourne, PLoS Computational Biology
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030044
- Do Not Be Lured into Just Any Collaboration
- Decide at the Beginning Who Will Work on What Tasks
- Stick to Your Tasks
- Be Open and Honest
- Feel Respect, Get Respect
- Communicate, Communicate, and Communicate
- Protect Yourself from a Collaboration That Turns Sour
- Always Acknowledge and Cite Your Collaborators
- Seek Advice from Experienced Scientists
- If Your Collaboration Satisfies You, Keep It Going
Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations
by Philip E. Bourne, PLoS Computational Biology
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030077
- Talk to the Audience
- Less is More
- Only Talk When You Have Something to Say
- Make the Take-Home Message Persistent
- Be Logical
- Treat the Floor as a Stage
- Practice and Time Your Presentation
- Use Visuals Sparingly but Effectively
- Review Audio and/or Video of Your Presentations
- Provide Appropriate Acknowledgments
Ten Simple Rules for a Good Poster Presentation
by Thomas C. Erren and Philip E. Bourne, PLoS Computational Biology
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030102
- Define the Purpose
- Sell Your Work in Ten Seconds
- The Title Is Important
- Poster Acceptance Means Nothing
- Many of the Rules for Writing a Good Paper Apply to Posters, Too
- Good Posters Have Unique Features Not Pertinent to Papers
- Layout and Format Are Critical
- Content Is Important, but Keep It Concise
- Posters Should Have Your Personality
- The Impact of a Poster Happens Both During and After the Poster Session
|